7 Best HockeyStack Attribution Alternatives for 2026 (B2B)
HockeyStack's $2,200+/mo too steep? Dreamdata offers similar B2B features from $999/mo with a free tier. Want model flexibility? mbuzz lets you compare 8 models and build custom rules at $29-299/mo. Need enterprise Salesforce? Bizible is the native choice. The trade-off: HockeyStack bundles everything—alternatives let you pick best-of-breed tools.
The Real Question
HockeyStack costs $2,200+/month and bundles everything together. You're here because you want B2B attribution without the all-in-one tax—or you need model flexibility to actually validate what's working.
Quick Answer
$2,200/mo too steep? HockeyStack is priced for well-funded startups.
→ Dreamdata from $999/mo with a free tier to start
→ mbuzz at $29-299/mo for focused attribution
Already have analytics tools? HockeyStack bundles things you might not need.
→ mbuzz for attribution-only, integrate with your existing stack
Need model flexibility? HockeyStack gives you one view.
→ mbuzz—compare 8 models, validate with custom rules
Enterprise Salesforce shop? HockeyStack isn't the native choice.
→ Bizible (Adobe Marketo Measure)
The Uncomfortable Truth
HockeyStack is fast to deploy and genuinely good at what it does. The problem? It's a bundle. You pay for web analytics, surveys, and attribution whether you need all three or not. And at $2,200+/month, that bundle adds up fast.
The bigger issue for serious B2B teams: you can't validate the attribution. HockeyStack says "LinkedIn drove this deal"—but you can't run a different model to check. You're trusting one black-box view of a 6-month sales cycle.
If you want all-in-one simplicity and have the budget, HockeyStack delivers. This guide is for teams who want flexibility or lower cost.
Common Reasons to Switch
| Limitation | Impact |
|---|---|
| Expensive | $2,200+/mo starting, increasing with traffic |
| All-in-one or nothing | Bundled analytics you may not need |
| No model flexibility | Can't validate if attribution is accurate |
| Vendor lock-in | Deep integration makes switching costly |
If any of these resonate, here are your best options.
See mbuzz in action
Explore 8 attribution models with sample data — no signup needed
Find Your HockeyStack Alternative
| Tool | Best For | Starting Price | Key Features | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
mbuzz
Server-side attribution with model flexibility
|
|
Free |
Custom models
Server-side
LTV
|
Try Free → |
Triple Whale
Shopify-native attribution
|
Shopify stores, Easy setup
|
$129/mo |
3 models
|
Alternatives → |
Northbeam
ML-powered DTC attribution
|
Enterprise DTC ($40M+), Dedicated media buyers
|
$400/mo |
View-through
1 model
|
Alternatives → |
HockeyStack
All-in-one B2B attribution
|
B2B SaaS, Series A-C
|
$2200/mo |
View-through
3 models
|
Alternatives → |
Dreamdata
B2B revenue attribution
|
B2B mid-market, Journey visualization
|
$999/mo (free tier) |
View-through
Journey viz
3 models
|
Alternatives → |
Rockerbox
Multi-channel attribution with MMM
|
Multi-channel brands, Podcast/TV advertisers
|
$200/mo (free tier) |
View-through
MMM
3 models
|
Alternatives → |
Ruler Analytics
Call tracking + attribution
|
Lead gen businesses, Call-heavy industries
|
£349/mo |
Calls
3 models
|
Alternatives → |
Hyros
High-ticket attribution
|
High-ticket sales, Info products
|
$500/mo |
LTV
3 models
|
|
Bizible (Adobe)
Enterprise Salesforce attribution
|
Enterprise B2B, Salesforce-heavy orgs
|
Custom |
View-through
5 models
|
|
Lifesight
Unified measurement platform
|
Enterprise brands, Full measurement stack
|
Custom |
LTV
View-through
MMM
|
|
Google Analytics 4
Free web analytics
|
Getting started, Budget zero
|
Free |
2 models
|
No tools match your filters
Try adjusting your criteria or
1. Mbuzz — Best for Model Flexibility
Why consider mbuzz: HockeyStack gives you one attribution view. mbuzz lets you compare 8 models side-by-side and build custom logic for B2B.
What mbuzz Offers
Server-side tracking built for B2B complexity. While HockeyStack relies on client-side tracking, mbuzz captures events on your backend—no ad blockers, no missing touches. This matters for B2B where buyer journeys span months and multiple devices.
8 attribution models for long sales cycles. Compare first-touch (who opened the door?), last-touch (who closed?), linear, time-decay, U-shaped, W-shaped, Markov Chain, and Shapley Value side-by-side. See how each model credits the same deal differently:
Attribution Model Comparison
Demo DataLinear
Conversions
2,382
Revenue
$147,230
Credit by Channel
Markov Chain
Conversions
2,382
Revenue
$147,230
Credit by Channel
Notice: Markov Chain credits Organic +7% more than Linear. Same data, different truth.
Custom attribution rules via rule editor. Weight touchpoints by stage, channel, or engagement depth:
within_window 90.days do
within_window 30.days, weight: 0.6 do
time_decay half_life: 7.days
end
within_window 30.days..60.days, weight: 0.4 do
time_decay half_life: 14.days
end
end
Build custom attribution rules in minutes. Weight channels, apply time-decay, define your own logic.
LTV attribution for recurring revenue. Your best first-month CAC channel might be your worst LTV channel. mbuzz tracks every renewal, upsell, and expansion back to original acquisition source—see which campaigns drive customers who renew at 130% NDR vs 80%.
Performance
By Channel
Real-time attribution • Compare models • Export anytime
Transparent pricing, not $2,200+/month:
| Tier | Records/Month | Price |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Up to 100K | $0 |
| Starter | Up to 1M | $29/mo |
| Growth | Up to 5M | $99/mo |
| Pro | Up to 25M | $299/mo |
10-minute setup with native SDKs for Rails, Django, Laravel, and Node.js — setup guide. Export raw data anytime—your pipeline data, no lock-in.
mbuzz vs HockeyStack
| Factor | HockeyStack | mbuzz |
|---|---|---|
| Attribution method | MTA | 8 models + custom rules |
| Validation | Trust the model | Experimental proof |
| Web analytics | ✓ Included | Integration |
| Built-in surveys | ✓ Yes | Integration |
| LinkedIn impressions | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Focused attribution—not bundled with analytics you don't need
- Custom rules for B2B pipeline-stage weighting
- LTV tracking for SaaS recurring revenue attribution
- $29-299/mo vs HockeyStack's $2,200+ starting price
- Server-side captures long B2B buyer journeys accurately
Cons
- Not all-in-one (no bundled web analytics or surveys)
- Requires SDK integration (not a pixel drop-in)
- No AI assistant—you interpret the models yourself
Who mbuzz is NOT For
Let's be honest—mbuzz isn't right for everyone:
- Teams wanting all-in-one simplicity — HockeyStack bundles analytics, surveys, and attribution together
- Teams without developer resources — SDK integration requires technical implementation
- Teams wanting AI to interpret data — mbuzz shows you the models; you interpret them
- Early-stage startups — GA4 or Dreamdata's free tier may be simpler to start
Best For
- B2B teams wanting to compare multiple attribution models
- Enterprise companies needing strong governance
- Those who want custom B2B attribution logic
- Companies wanting transparent, inspectable models
B2B attribution without the $2,200/mo price tag
Compare 8 models side-by-side. Build custom B2B attribution logic. Start free.
Try mbuzz Free →
2. Dreamdata — Best for Budget-Conscious B2B
Why consider Dreamdata: Similar B2B focus, transparent pricing, free tier available.
Dreamdata vs HockeyStack
| Factor | HockeyStack | Dreamdata |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | ✗ No | ✓ Yes (Individual) |
| Team pricing | $2,200+/mo | $999/mo |
| Setup time | ~2 weeks | 4-8 weeks |
| Journey visualization | Good | Excellent |
| All-in-one | Yes | No |
| LinkedIn impressions | ✓ Yes | Limited |
Why Dreamdata Over HockeyStack
Dreamdata offers the core B2B attribution capabilities at roughly half the price, with a free tier to start. The tradeoff: slower setup and no bundled analytics.
Best For
- B2B teams with budget constraints
- Those wanting to try before buying (free tier)
- Teams focused on journey visualization
- Companies that don't need all-in-one
Also consider: Dreamdata alternatives for other mid-market options.
3. Bizible — Best for Enterprise Salesforce
Why consider Bizible: The enterprise standard for Salesforce-native B2B attribution.
Bizible vs HockeyStack
| Factor | HockeyStack | Bizible |
|---|---|---|
| Salesforce integration | Good | Native (deepest) |
| Enterprise governance | Limited | ✓ Strong |
| ABM support | Moderate | ✓ Strong |
| Setup time | ~2 weeks | 3-6 months |
| Pricing | Transparent | Enterprise (custom) |
| Multiple attribution models | Yes | Yes (parallel) |
Why Bizible Over HockeyStack
For enterprise B2B organizations deeply invested in Salesforce and Marketo, Bizible provides native integration that HockeyStack can't match. The tradeoff: complex implementation and enterprise pricing.
Best For
- Large enterprises ($100M+ revenue)
- Deep Salesforce/Marketo investment
- Complex ABM requirements
- Teams with RevOps resources
4. Factors Ai — Best Affordable AI-Powered
Why consider Factors.ai: AI-powered attribution at roughly 1/5 of HockeyStack's price.
Factors.ai vs HockeyStack
| Factor | HockeyStack | Factors.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $2,200/mo | $399/mo |
| AI capabilities | Odin assistant | AI recommendations |
| CRM integration | Multiple | Multiple |
| Setup complexity | Low | Low |
| Expert support | Included | Optional tiers |
Why Factors.ai Over HockeyStack
For smaller B2B teams, Factors.ai delivers AI-powered attribution insights at a fraction of HockeyStack's cost. Expert consulting hours are included in packages.
Best For
- Growth-stage B2B ($1-10M ARR)
- Small teams without analysts
- Those wanting AI assistance on budget
- Companies needing expert support
5. Terminus — Best for ABM-Focused
Why consider Terminus: Purpose-built for account-based marketing measurement.
Terminus vs HockeyStack
| Factor | HockeyStack | Terminus |
|---|---|---|
| ABM focus | Moderate | Core purpose |
| Account-level analytics | Yes | Yes (deeper) |
| Ad platform | Integration | ✓ Included |
| Starting price | $2,200/mo | Custom |
| Best for | General B2B | ABM-heavy orgs |
Why Terminus Over HockeyStack
If your go-to-market is deeply ABM-focused, Terminus provides purpose-built measurement that treats accounts as first-class citizens throughout.
Best For
- ABM-primary organizations
- Account-based advertising users
- Enterprise B2B with target account lists
- Sales-marketing alignment focus
6. Calibermind — Best for Enterprise B2B
Why consider CaliberMind: Full-featured enterprise B2B attribution with strong data foundation.
CaliberMind vs HockeyStack
| Factor | HockeyStack | CaliberMind |
|---|---|---|
| Enterprise readiness | Growing | Mature |
| Data governance | Limited | ✓ Strong |
| Custom data models | Limited | ✓ Flexible |
| B2B complexity handling | Good | Better |
| Pricing | Transparent | Enterprise (custom) |
Why CaliberMind Over HockeyStack
Enterprise B2B with complex data structures and governance requirements may find HockeyStack limiting. CaliberMind is built for enterprise scale.
Best For
- Enterprise B2B ($50M+ ARR)
- Complex data structures
- Governance/compliance requirements
- Multi-faceted GTM motions
7. Ga4 — Best Free Option
Why consider GA4: Free, and you're probably already using it.
GA4 vs HockeyStack
| Factor | HockeyStack | GA4 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $2,200+/mo | Free |
| B2B-specific features | ✓ Yes | ✗ Limited |
| Account-based | ✓ Yes | ✗ No |
| CRM integration | ✓ Native | Manual |
| Attribution models | B2B-optimized | Generic |
| Long sales cycles | ✓ Designed for | ✗ Limited |
Why GA4 Over HockeyStack
If you're bootstrapped or early-stage, GA4's free attribution is better than nothing. The tradeoff: you'll manually stitch account-level data and lack B2B-specific features.
Best For
- Pre-revenue or early-stage startups
- Teams with strong technical resources
- Those validating need before buying
- Supplementary measurement alongside other tools
How to Choose: Decision Framework
By Budget
| Monthly Budget | Best Options |
|---|---|
| Free | GA4, Dreamdata Individual |
| Under $500 | Factors.ai, Dreamdata Team |
| $500-2000 | Dreamdata Business, Factors.ai |
| $2000+ | mbuzz, HockeyStack, CaliberMind |
| Enterprise | Bizible, CaliberMind, mbuzz |
By Primary Need
| If You Need... | Best Alternative |
|---|---|
| Model flexibility | mbuzz |
| Lower cost | Dreamdata, Factors.ai |
| Enterprise Salesforce | Bizible |
| ABM focus | Terminus |
| AI on budget | Factors.ai |
| Free starting point | GA4, Dreamdata free |
By Company Stage
| Stage | Best Fit |
|---|---|
| Pre-revenue | GA4 |
| Seed - Series A | Dreamdata, Factors.ai |
| Series B-C | HockeyStack, Dreamdata, mbuzz |
| Growth ($20-50M) | mbuzz, Dreamdata, CaliberMind |
| Enterprise ($50M+) | Bizible, CaliberMind, mbuzz |
The All-in-One Question
HockeyStack bundles attribution + web analytics + surveys. Is that what you want?
All-in-One (HockeyStack)
Pros
- Single vendor
- Pre-integrated data
- Faster deployment
- Unified interface
Cons
- Paying for features you may not need
- Not the best at each component
- Harder to swap pieces
- Vendor lock-in
Best-of-Breed (mbuzz + tools)
Pros
- Best tool for each job
- Swap components as needed
- Pay only for what you need
- Deep expertise per area
Cons
- More vendors to manage
- Integration work required
- Potentially longer setup
- Data stitching needed
If you already have web analytics (GA4, Heap, Amplitude), HockeyStack's bundled analytics is redundant cost.
Summary: Best HockeyStack Alternatives
| Alternative | Primary Strength | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|
| mbuzz | 8 models + custom rules | Free tier, $29-299/mo |
| Dreamdata | Budget-friendly with free tier | Free / $999/mo |
| Bizible | Enterprise Salesforce-native | Enterprise |
| Factors.ai | AI-powered on budget | $399/mo |
| Terminus | ABM-focused measurement | Custom |
| CaliberMind | Enterprise B2B | Custom |
| GA4 | Free basics | Free |
The bottom line: HockeyStack excels for Series A-C B2B SaaS wanting fast, all-in-one deployment. If you need validated attribution, lower pricing, enterprise governance, or don't want bundled analytics—these alternatives deliver what HockeyStack doesn't.
Looking for a HockeyStack Alternative?
mbuzz offers the same attribution models at a fraction of the price. Free up to 100K records/month.
Try mbuzz Free →Related Comparisons
- Dreamdata Alternatives — More mid-market B2B options
- Triple Whale Alternatives — E-commerce focused
- Multi-Touch Attribution Tools Compared — Full market overview
Key Takeaways
- ✓HockeyStack is expensive ($2,200+/mo)—Dreamdata offers similar features from $999/mo with a free tier
- ✓HockeyStack lacks custom attribution models—mbuzz validates B2B attribution with experiments
- ✓HockeyStack's all-in-one approach isn't for everyone—best-of-breed may fit better
- ✓Enterprise teams often outgrow HockeyStack—Bizible and CaliberMind scale further
- ✓HockeyStack setup is fast (~2 weeks)—but other tools may be faster for simpler needs
Why look for HockeyStack alternatives?▼
What's the cheapest HockeyStack alternative?▼
Which HockeyStack alternative is best for enterprise?▼
Does any HockeyStack alternative have custom attribution models?▼
Is HockeyStack or Dreamdata better?▼
Ready to try it?
Set up server-side attribution in 10 minutes. Free up to 100K records/month.