6 Best Northbeam Attribution Alternatives for 2026 (Transparent Pricing)

· 11 min read

Northbeam too expensive or too black-box? mbuzz gives you transparent models at $29-299/mo (vs $2K+). Want simpler? Triple Whale ($129/mo) works great for Shopify stores. Need multi-channel with MMM? Rockerbox includes podcast/TV tracking. The core trade-off: Northbeam's ML is sophisticated but opaque—alternatives offer transparency, lower cost, or both.

The Real Question

Northbeam is expensive and opaque. You're here because you want the same sophistication without the $2K+ monthly bill—or you want to actually understand your attribution, not just trust a black box.

Quick Answer

Budget constrained? Northbeam scales to $2-5K+/mo for high-traffic sites.
mbuzz at $29-299/mo with transparent, flat pricing

Want to understand the math? Northbeam's ML is a black box.
mbuzz—8 inspectable models, build your own logic

Simpler Shopify store? Northbeam is overkill under $40M revenue.
Triple Whale at $129/mo for basic DTC attribution

Need multi-channel with offline? Northbeam is digital-focused.
Rockerbox for podcast/TV/direct mail tracking

The Uncomfortable Truth

Northbeam's ML is genuinely sophisticated. The problem? You can't inspect it. When Northbeam says "Meta deserves 34% credit," you have no idea why. Maybe it's right. Maybe the model is overfitting to your biggest spend channel. You'll never know.

For $2-5K/month, you're paying for a number you have to take on faith.

If you're an enterprise DTC brand with a dedicated media buying team and you trust black-box ML, Northbeam might be worth it. This guide is for everyone who wants transparency.

Common Reasons to Switch

Limitation Impact
Expensive $400+/mo at entry, scales with pageviews—high-traffic sites pay $2-5K+/mo
Black box ML Can't inspect why Channel A gets 30% vs Channel B's 25%
No custom models You get their ML output—no way to define your own logic
Enterprise focus Overkill for brands under $40M revenue

If any of these resonate, here are your best options.

Northbeam
Northbeam MTA dashboard interface
Northbeam's ML-powered attribution dashboard
Interactive Demo

See mbuzz in action

Explore 8 attribution models with sample data — no signup needed

Try Demo

Find Your Northbeam Alternative

Price:
Market:
Features:
Setup time:
11 tools
Tool Best For Starting Price Key Features
mbuzz logo
mbuzz
Server-side attribution with model flexibility
Free
Custom models Server-side LTV
Try Free →
Triple Whale logo
Triple Whale
Shopify-native attribution
Shopify stores, Easy setup
$129/mo
3 models
Alternatives →
Northbeam logo
Northbeam
ML-powered DTC attribution
Enterprise DTC ($40M+), Dedicated media buyers
$400/mo
View-through 1 model
Alternatives →
HockeyStack logo
HockeyStack
All-in-one B2B attribution
B2B SaaS, Series A-C
$2200/mo
View-through 3 models
Alternatives →
Dreamdata logo
Dreamdata
B2B revenue attribution
B2B mid-market, Journey visualization
$999/mo (free tier)
View-through Journey viz 3 models
Alternatives →
Rockerbox logo
Rockerbox
Multi-channel attribution with MMM
Multi-channel brands, Podcast/TV advertisers
$200/mo (free tier)
View-through MMM 3 models
Alternatives →
Ruler Analytics logo
Ruler Analytics
Call tracking + attribution
Lead gen businesses, Call-heavy industries
£349/mo
Calls 3 models
Alternatives →
Hyros logo
Hyros
High-ticket attribution
High-ticket sales, Info products
$500/mo
LTV 3 models
Bizible (Adobe) logo
Bizible (Adobe)
Enterprise Salesforce attribution
Enterprise B2B, Salesforce-heavy orgs
Custom
View-through 5 models
Lifesight logo
Lifesight
Unified measurement platform
Enterprise brands, Full measurement stack
Custom
LTV View-through MMM
Google Analytics 4 logo
Google Analytics 4
Free web analytics
Getting started, Budget zero
Free
2 models

Mbuzz logo

1. Mbuzz — Best for Model Flexibility + Transparent Pricing

Why consider mbuzz: Northbeam gives you one ML-generated number. mbuzz gives you 8 models to compare, plus a rule editor to build your own logic—at a fraction of the price.

What mbuzz Offers

Transparent attribution you can actually understand. No black-box ML—just clear models with logic you can inspect and customize. 8 built-in models including Markov Chain and Shapley Value, plus a rule editor for custom rules.

Server-side tracking that captures 95%+ of events. Northbeam still relies on client-side pixels that ad blockers defeat. mbuzz tracks on your backend—no missing data.

Side-by-side model comparison. See how First Touch, Last Touch, Linear, Time Decay, U-Shaped, and data-driven models credit the same conversions differently. Northbeam gives you one number; mbuzz shows you the range:

Attribution Model Comparison

Demo Data

Linear

Conversions

2,382

Revenue

$147,230

Credit by Channel

Paid Search
28%
Organic
24%
Email
19%
Paid Social
17%
Direct
12%

Markov Chain

Conversions

2,382

Revenue

$147,230

Credit by Channel

Paid Search
22%
Organic
31%
Email
14%
Paid Social
21%
Direct
12%

Notice: Markov Chain credits Organic +7% more than Linear. Same data, different truth.

Custom models via simple rule editor. Don't wait for feature requests—write your own attribution logic in minutes:

Custom Time-Decay Attribution
Rule Editor
within_window 90.days do
  within_window 30.days, weight: 0.6 do
    time_decay half_life: 7.days
  end

  within_window 30.days..60.days, weight: 0.4 do
    time_decay half_life: 14.days
  end
end

Build custom attribution rules in minutes. Weight channels, apply time-decay, define your own logic.

LTV attribution, not just first purchase. Your worst first-month channel might be your best LTV channel. mbuzz tracks recurring revenue back to original acquisition source—see which campaigns drive customers who stick around.

Conversions Funnel Events
30d First Touch
Conversions
2,847 +12%
Revenue
$284K +19%
AOV
$100 +6%
Avg Days
4.2
Channels
2.8
Visits
5.3

Performance

Paid Email Organic

By Channel

Paid
$142K
Email
$71K
Organic
$43K
Direct
$21K

Real-time attribution • Compare models • Export anytime

Pricing without traffic penalties:

Tier Records/Month Price
Free Up to 100K $0
Starter Up to 1M $29/mo
Growth Up to 5M $99/mo
Pro Up to 25M $299/mo

Compare to Northbeam's pageview-based pricing that can hit $2-5K/month for high-traffic sites.

10-minute setup with native SDKs for Rails, Django, Laravel, and Node.jssetup guide. Export everything anytime—your data, no lock-in.

mbuzz vs Northbeam

Factor Northbeam mbuzz
Attribution method ML fractional credit 8 models + custom rules
Transparency Black box Inspect any model
Custom logic ✗ No ✓ custom rules
Pricing $400+/mo, scales with traffic Free tier, $29-299/mo
Target size $40M+ brands All sizes

The Transparency Difference

Northbeam Approach

  • ML assigns fractional credit
  • Total sums to 100% (no over-attribution)
  • But why does Facebook get 30% vs Google's 25%?
  • "Trust the algorithm"

mbuzz Approach

  • Pick your model (or compare all 8)
  • See exactly how each model assigns credit
  • Build custom logic: "weight branded search lower"
  • Understand why—not just what

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Transparent models you can inspect—no black-box ML
  • $29-299/mo vs Northbeam's $2-5K+ pricing
  • Compare 8 models side-by-side, not one magic number
  • Flat pricing—no surprise bills as traffic grows
  • Custom rules to define your own attribution logic

Cons

  • Requires SDK integration (not a pixel drop-in)
  • More hands-on than Northbeam's "set and forget" approach
  • You choose between models—no single auto-generated answer

Who mbuzz is NOT For

Let's be honest—mbuzz isn't right for everyone:

Best For

Transparent attribution, transparent pricing

No black-box ML. No enterprise sales calls. See exactly how each model works.

Try mbuzz Free →

Rockerbox logo

2. Rockerbox — Best for Multi-Channel Brands

Why consider Rockerbox: If you run podcasts, TV, or influencer campaigns, Rockerbox measures channels Northbeam handles less well.

Rockerbox vs Northbeam

Factor Northbeam Rockerbox
Digital attribution ✓ Strong ✓ Good
Podcast tracking Limited ✓ Strong
TV/OTT Limited ✓ Strong
MMM included ✗ No ✓ Yes
Starting price $400/mo $200/mo
Use case Tactical media buying Strategic CMO decisions

Why Rockerbox Over Northbeam

Northbeam excels at digital performance marketing. Rockerbox captures brand/awareness channels that drive demand but don't get direct clicks.

Best For

Also consider: Triple Whale alternatives if Rockerbox is still too complex.


Triple Whale logo

3. Triple Whale — Best for Simplicity and Budget

Why consider Triple Whale: If Northbeam feels like overkill, Triple Whale delivers 80% of the value at 30% of the cost.

Triple Whale vs Northbeam

Factor Northbeam Triple Whale
Starting price $400/mo $129/mo
Platform support All Shopify only
Learning curve Steep Low
Setup time Weeks Hours
Over-attribution prevention ✓ Strong ✗ Can occur
Target brand size $40M+ $1-30M

Why Triple Whale Over Northbeam

For Shopify brands under $30M revenue, Triple Whale provides solid attribution without the complexity tax. You lose Northbeam's ML sophistication, but many brands don't need it.

Best For

Limitation: Shopify-only. See Triple Whale alternatives for multi-platform options.


Lifesight logo

4. Lifesight — Best for Unified Measurement

Why consider Lifesight: Combines MTA + MMM + incrementality + causal AI in one platform.

Lifesight vs Northbeam

Factor Northbeam Lifesight
MTA ✓ ML-powered ✓ Included
MMM ✗ No ✓ Included
Incrementality ✗ No ✓ Included
Causal AI Limited ✓ Included
Approach Single method Triangulation
Pricing Pageview-based Custom

Why Lifesight Over Northbeam

Northbeam provides sophisticated MTA. Lifesight provides the full measurement stack—MTA, MMM, and incrementality working together. This is the "triangulation" approach that modern measurement demands.

Best For


Segmentstream logo

5. Segmentstream — Best for Cookieless Future

Why consider SegmentStream: AI-driven attribution designed for a world without cookies.

SegmentStream vs Northbeam

Factor Northbeam SegmentStream
Cookie dependency First-party focused Cookieless-first
AI approach ML fractional credit Visit scoring + prediction
Incrementality ✗ No ✓ Geo holdout validation
Privacy focus Standard Strong
Pricing Pageview-based Custom

Why SegmentStream Over Northbeam

SegmentStream's "Visit Scoring" measures impact without relying on traditional conversion tracking. As privacy restrictions tighten, this forward-looking approach may prove more durable.

Best For


Hyros logo

6. Hyros — Best for High-Ticket Sales

Why consider Hyros: If you sell $500+ products with longer sales cycles, Hyros is purpose-built for your use case.

Hyros vs Northbeam

Factor Northbeam Hyros
Ideal AOV Any $500+
Sales cycle Any Longer (days/weeks)
Call tracking Limited ✓ Included
AI optimization Limited ✓ Claimed 20% lift
Pricing transparency Moderate Low (invite-only)
Commitment Monthly 6 months

Why Hyros Over Northbeam

Northbeam is platform-agnostic. Hyros is purpose-built for info products, coaching, consulting, and high-ticket e-commerce with longer consideration cycles.

Best For

Caveat: Invite-only with 6-month commitment. Evaluate carefully.


How to Choose: Decision Framework

By Your Primary Need

If You Need... Best Alternative
Model flexibility + transparent pricing mbuzz
Simpler and cheaper Triple Whale
Podcast/TV measurement Rockerbox
Full measurement stack Lifesight
Cookieless preparation SegmentStream
High-ticket optimization Hyros

By Your Budget

Monthly Budget Best Options
Under $200 Triple Whale (Shopify), Rockerbox free tier
$200-500 Rockerbox, Hyros, Triple Whale
$500-2000 mbuzz, Hyros, Rockerbox paid
$2000+ mbuzz, Lifesight, SegmentStream

By Team Sophistication

Team Type Best Fit
Owner-operator Triple Whale
Small marketing team Rockerbox, Triple Whale
Growth team with analyst mbuzz, Rockerbox
Dedicated media buyers mbuzz, Lifesight
Data science team SegmentStream, Lifesight

Summary: Best Northbeam Alternatives

Alternative Primary Strength Starting Price
mbuzz 8 models + custom rules + transparent pricing Free tier
Rockerbox Multi-channel + MMM $200/mo
Triple Whale Simple + affordable $129/mo
Lifesight Unified measurement stack Custom
SegmentStream Cookieless AI attribution Custom
Hyros High-ticket optimization ~$500/mo

The bottom line: Northbeam is excellent for enterprise DTC brands with dedicated media buying teams. If you need transparent models, custom attribution logic, accessible pricing, or simpler tooling—these alternatives deliver what Northbeam doesn't.

Looking for a Northbeam Alternative?

mbuzz offers transparent pricing without enterprise sales calls. All features included at every tier.

Try mbuzz Free →

Key Takeaways

  • Northbeam is expensive and complex—alternatives range from $129/mo to enterprise pricing
  • Northbeam's ML is a black box—mbuzz offers 8 transparent models plus custom rules
  • Northbeam requires dedicated media buyers—simpler tools suit smaller teams
  • Northbeam pricing scales with traffic—mbuzz has transparent, flat pricing
  • For smaller brands, Northbeam is overkill—Triple Whale or Rockerbox may suffice
Why look for Northbeam alternatives?
Common reasons: Northbeam is expensive ($400+/mo, increasing with traffic), requires steep learning curve and dedicated media buyers, uses opaque ML you can't inspect, and is overkill for brands under $40M revenue.
Is Northbeam worth the price?
For enterprise DTC brands ($40M+ revenue) with dedicated media buying teams, Northbeam's ML-powered attribution can be valuable. For smaller brands or teams without dedicated analysts, simpler alternatives often provide better ROI.
What's the best cheap alternative to Northbeam?
mbuzz offers a free tier with 8 attribution models (including Markov Chain and Shapley Value—same sophistication as Northbeam's ML approach, but transparent). Paid plans start at $29/mo. Rockerbox also has a free tier ($200/mo paid). Triple Whale starts at $129/mo (Shopify only).
Which Northbeam alternative offers the most model flexibility?
mbuzz includes 8 attribution models (First Touch, Last Touch, Linear, Time Decay, U-Shaped, W-Shaped, Markov Chain, Shapley Value) plus a custom rules to build your own logic. Most competitors offer 3-4 models with no customization.
Can I use Northbeam and another tool together?
Some brands run multiple attribution tools for comparison. However, this adds cost and complexity. Consider whether one tool with more model flexibility (like mbuzz) could serve both needs.
Holly Henderson
Holly Henderson

Co-Founder, mbuzz

Holly Henderson is Co-Founder of mbuzz. With 10+ years in marketing including roles at Westpac, Avon, and Forebrite, she's obsessed with making measurement actually useful.

Harvard Extension School Forebrite Westpac Avon

Ready to try it?

Set up server-side attribution in 10 minutes. Free up to 100K records/month.